http://tankerenemy.blogspot.com/2010/01/main-stream-media-promotes-geo.html
Main stream media promotes geo-engineering as climate solution
by Mark Andrew Riedel for examiner.com
Now that the Copenhagen climate talks have come and gone without an agreement, (as was predicted by most, if not all, members of the 193 country conference), certain main stream media publications have hinted at 'alternative' climate cooling solutions.
One of these 'suggestions' came in the August 2009 issue of National Geographic, stating that the earth is in need of a "planetary sunshade" consisting of reflective particles such as sulfate, delivered by "planes, balloons, (or) battleship guns pointed upward".
Another 'suggestion' came from the Dec 7, 2009 edition of Newsweek titled, "Copenhagen, Schmopenhagen", and originated from the same source, Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and the Copenhagen Consensus Center. The delivery system would work as follows: "Military planes (or helium balloons) spray the stratophere with sulfur gases, which disperse and oxidize. The particles scatter back into space some of the sunlight that would have been absorbed by the planet's surface. As more sunlight is deflected, the planet cools. It's like an artificial version of an erupting volcano."
These 'suggestions' seem like viable alternatives to carbon reduction to the average reader, but there are many who have been watching the skies over most of the industrialized world during the past decade or so, who would like some explanation as to what has already been being sprayed into the earth's atmosphere.
The phenomenon known as "chemtrails" has been broadcast on video sharing sites such as youtube and dailymotion for some time now, but until now, most mainstreamers dismiss this topic as an exageration, or just another conspiracy theory. The powers that be have been using geoengineering methods without proper testing, without taking proper safety precautions, without permission, and most importantly, without any explanation.
The fact that these "suggestions" occurred before the Copenhagen summit even took place is the issue in question. It is a known fact that the Council on Foreign Relations is a supporter of geo-engineering. In Newsweek's article they go on to state that, "one kilogram of sulfur could offset the effect of several hundred thousand kilograms of carbon dioxide (and that) potential downsides (include) regional ozone depletion, shifts in weather patterns, (and) drought."
Now that the Copenhagen climate talks have come and gone without an agreement, (as was predicted by most, if not all, members of the 193 country conference), certain main stream media publications have hinted at 'alternative' climate cooling solutions.
One of these 'suggestions' came in the August 2009 issue of National Geographic, stating that the earth is in need of a "planetary sunshade" consisting of reflective particles such as sulfate, delivered by "planes, balloons, (or) battleship guns pointed upward".
Another 'suggestion' came from the Dec 7, 2009 edition of Newsweek titled, "Copenhagen, Schmopenhagen", and originated from the same source, Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and the Copenhagen Consensus Center. The delivery system would work as follows: "Military planes (or helium balloons) spray the stratophere with sulfur gases, which disperse and oxidize. The particles scatter back into space some of the sunlight that would have been absorbed by the planet's surface. As more sunlight is deflected, the planet cools. It's like an artificial version of an erupting volcano."
These 'suggestions' seem like viable alternatives to carbon reduction to the average reader, but there are many who have been watching the skies over most of the industrialized world during the past decade or so, who would like some explanation as to what has already been being sprayed into the earth's atmosphere.
The phenomenon known as "chemtrails" has been broadcast on video sharing sites such as youtube and dailymotion for some time now, but until now, most mainstreamers dismiss this topic as an exageration, or just another conspiracy theory. The powers that be have been using geoengineering methods without proper testing, without taking proper safety precautions, without permission, and most importantly, without any explanation.
The fact that these "suggestions" occurred before the Copenhagen summit even took place is the issue in question. It is a known fact that the Council on Foreign Relations is a supporter of geo-engineering. In Newsweek's article they go on to state that, "one kilogram of sulfur could offset the effect of several hundred thousand kilograms of carbon dioxide (and that) potential downsides (include) regional ozone depletion, shifts in weather patterns, (and) drought."
Maddài, piantala di sparare minchiate col microsoft (c) translate che hai sul tuo "sito" della minchia, comandante clusò. Leggi la traduzione inversa in italiano, bestia, almeno totò faceva ridere perché era un VERO comico, tu fai solo pena:
ReplyDeleteOra che i colloqui di Copenaghen sul clima sono andati e venuti senza un accordo, (come era stato previsto dalla maggior parte, se non tutti, i membri della Conferenza di 193 paesi), alcune pubblicazioni principali mezzi di comunicazione ruscello hanno accennato a 'clima alternative' di raffreddamento solutions.One di questi 'suggerimenti' venuto in agosto 2009 numero del National Geographic, affermando che la terra ha bisogno di un 'ombrellone planetaria' costituito da particelle riflettenti come il solfato, realizzato da 'aerei, palloni, (o) fucili da guerra puntate verso l'alto' . Un altro 'suggerimento' venuto dal 7 dicembre 2009 edizione di Newsweek intitolato 'di Copenaghen, Schmopenhagen', e nasce dalla stessa fonte, Ken Caldeira, della Carnegie Institution e del Copenhagen Consensus Center. Il sistema di consegna sarebbe lavorare come segue: 'gli aerei militari (o palloncini), spruzzare la stratophere con i gas di zolfo, che si disperdono e si ossidano. Le particelle retrodiffusione nello spazio alcuni dei raggi solari che sarebbe stata assorbita dalla superficie del pianeta. Quanto più la luce del sole è deviato, il pianeta si raffredda. È come una versione artificiale di un vulcano in eruzione. 'Questi' suggerimenti 'sembrare valide alternative per la riduzione del carbonio per il lettore medio, ma ci sono molti che sono stati a guardare il cielo su gran parte del mondo industrializzato negli ultimi dieci anni o giù di lì, che vorrebbe qualche spiegazione di quanto è già stato essere spruzzato nel fenomeno atmosphere.The della terra conosciuta come 'scie chimiche' è stato trasmesso su siti di video sharing come YouTube e dailymotion per qualche tempo, ma fino ad ora, la maggior parte mainstreamers respingere questo argomento come un exageration, o solo un'altra teoria del complotto. I poteri che sarebbero state usando metodi di Geoingegneria senza la corretta sperimentazione, senza prendere le precauzioni di sicurezza adeguato, senza permesso, e, soprattutto, senza alcun fatto explanation.The che questi 'suggerimenti' si sono verificati prima del vertice di Copenaghen si è svolta anche la questione di cui trattasi . È un fatto noto che il Council on Foreign Relations è un sostenitore di geo-ingegneria. Nell'articolo di Newsweek vanno affermando che, 'un chilo di zolfo grado di compensare l'effetto di diverse centinaia di migliaia di chili di anidride carbonica (e svantaggi) potenziali (compresi) di riduzione dell'ozono regionale, cambiamenti nelle tendenze meteorologiche, (e) la siccità. '
ilpeyote pubblished (LOL) by Straker