Geoingegneria clandestina e media di regime

il maiuscolo era colpa mia. avevo fatto casino nel copia e incolla

http://www.tankerenemy.com/2015/02/geoingegneria-clandestina-e-media-di.html

Geoingegneria clandestina e media di regime

Pubblichiamo un recente articolo di Dane Wigington, [grande esperto e grande scienziato n.d.essse] tradotto dall’autore di Offskies. L’attivista californiano chiarisce e denuncia le connivenze dei media ufficiali nelle mistificazioni e nei silenzi inerenti alla geoingegneria illegale.



La geoingegneria illegale non potrà più essere nascosta ancora per molto tempo: i media di regime hanno dovuto cominciare ad affrontare questo problema su larga scala. Negli ultimi tempi sono state pubblicate diverse decine di articoli su testate ufficiali: ventidue di questi sono a disposizione per un’adeguata analisi (vedi fonte in inglese).

Viviamo in un mondo di fumo e di specchi. Un gran numero di figure appartenenti al mondo accademico ha contribuito a creare le illusioni che finora hanno occultato le realtà più terribili: sono realtà che ora abbiamo tutti di fronte. Le bugie e le omissioni sono una parte importante di quell'inganno a cui siamo stati sottoposti ed ognuno di quegli articoli è un esempio lampante di tutto ciò.

In primo luogo, ognuna delle pubblicazioni perpetua la menzogna palese che l'ingegneria del clima è solo per ora una "proposta". Inoltre nessun pezzo di quelli citati (per colpa degli “esperti” che hanno trasmesso loro dati erronei e lacunosi?) si preoccupa mai di menzionare il fatto più clamoroso ed importante di tutti per quanto riguarda "le cosiddette proposte di geoingegneria tramite aerosol": ogni singola particella dispersa in aria deve per forza di cose ricadere a terra! Ogni organismo vivente è soggetto a questa contaminazione, ma questo fatto indiscutibile non è mai neppure accennato.

La struttura di potere non vuole prendere in considerazione le domande della popolazione sugli ovvi pericoli direttamente legati alle attività di geoingegneria clandestina. Il geoingegnere David Keith è stato interpellato in occasione di una conferenza scientifica sul suo "progetto" di diffondere 20.000.000 di tonnellate di alluminio in atmosfera: la sua risposta dovrebbe scandalizzare ed indignare qualsiasi persona dotata di un briciolo di buon senso.

Gli “scienziati” ed i media mainstream omettono sempre di menzionare il fatto che disperdere particolato tossico nell'atmosfera deve giocoforza avvelenare l'intera superficie del pianeta. Le chemtrails hanno provocato uno spaventoso inquinamento della biosfera: ogni nostro respiro è ormai contaminato.

Tutti sono necessari nella lotta in corso per informare, esporre e tentare di interrompere l’insania della geoingegneria. Fate sentire la vostra voce.

Fonte in italiano
Fonte originale

una fonte meglio dell'altra!

N.A.S.A. admits chemtrails!

http://tankerenemy.blogspot.it/2012/03/nasa-admits-chemtrails.html

N.A.S.A. admits chemtrails!

N.A.S.A., the pseudo-scientific and military agency, notorious for lies, manipulations and the "education" programs which teach the students to confuse chemtrails with harmless clouds, admits the Geoengineering. In the following article the author quotes trimethylaluminum, a poisonous compound sprayed by chemical planes. Moreover the description about "milky, white clouds" perfectly matches with the mortal trails we see every day in the sky. Let's forget scientific aims: everything is a disgusting pretext to pollute the atmosphere and control the planet.

High in the sky, 60 to 65 miles above Earth's surface, winds rush through a little understood region of Earth's atmosphere at speeds of 200 to 300 miles per hour. Lower than a typical satellite's orbit, higher than where most planes fly, this upper atmosphere jet stream makes a perfect target for a particular kind of scientific experiment: the sounding rocket. Some 35 to 40 feet long, sounding rockets shoot up into the sky for short journeys of eight to ten minutes, allowing scientists to probe difficult-to-reach layers of the atmosphere.

In March, N.A.S.A. will launch five such rockets in approximately five minutes to study these high-altitude winds and their intimate connection to the complicated electrical current patterns that surround Earth. First noticed in the 1960s, the winds in this jet stream shouldn't be confused with the lower jet stream located around 30,000 feet, through which passenger jets fly and which is reported in weather forecasts. This rocket experiment is designed to gain a better understanding of the high-altitude winds and help scientists better model the electromagnetic regions of space that can damage man-made satellites and disrupt communications systems. The experiment will also help explain how the effects of atmospheric disturbances in one part of the globe can be transported to other parts of the globe in a mere day or two.

The five sounding rockets, known as the Anomalous Transport Rocket Experiment (ATREX), will launch from N.A.S.A.'s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia releasing a chemical tracer into the air. The chemical -- a substance called trimethylaluminum -- forms milky, white clouds that allow those on the ground to "see" the winds in space and track them with cameras. In addition, two of the rockets will have instrumented payloads to measure pressure and temperature in the atmosphere.

Source: nasa.gov

 

Pubblished by Zret 

Messing with Disaster: International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies

http://tankerenemy.blogspot.com/2010/03/messing-with-disaster-international.html

Messing with Disaster: International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies

By Jutta Schmitt

This week, from March 22nd to March 26th, the 'Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies', hosted by the Climate Response Fund, is taking place in Pacific Grove, California-USA, where scientists discuss possible means to counter-balance climate change and its impacts. The kind of measures proposed to mitigate climate change pertain to the realm of geo-engineering and climate intervention techniques, and are outlined in the Conference's working agenda.(1)

The agenda itself can best be described as an array of proposals for 'disaster management', aimed at 'moderating' global climate change. Listed among the various physical science aspects of climate intervention are experiments related to Solar Radiance Engineering, which respond to 'Solar Radiation Management' or the 'management of climate change in the stratosphere and above', which test 'the potential for aerosols in the troposphere or stratosphere to limit incoming solar radiation'. Under the specific approaches for Solar Radiation Management figure the stratospheric injection of sulfate or other materials with global or regional coverage, satellite deflection of solar radiation, cloud brightening on a global or regional scale by sea salt or dimethyl sulfide (DMS) injection, 'ocean brightening' as another means to deflect solar radiation, arctic intervention and specific regional intervention relating to hurricane modification and redirection of storms, among others.

Hold on. - 'Spraying the stratosphere with sulfate or other materials'?! - 'Hurricane modification and redirection of storms'?! Until recently, suggesting that this kind of experiments were being considered in earnest by high level scientist panels or that they could already be going on as we speak, was denounced as the pathetic fantasies of global conspiracy theorists gone crazy! But now and as Copenhaguen went down the drain, all of a sudden we see the emergence of a Global Climate Crisis Management Team, ready to 'geo-engineer' us out of the mess.

Let's take a closer look at the proposed 'innovative' techniques to deflect solar radiation, especially as they've already been put into operation for quite some time. Since years, former German Greenpeace activist Werner Altnickel, who obtained the German and European Solar Prize distinctions for his alternative solar energy projects implemented successfully in his hometown, Oldenburg, has referred to the already ongoing spraying of the stratosphere with sulfate or other materials as described in the Climate Response Fund's working agenda, in terms of a chemical crime committed right above our heads, clearly visible to the public in form of the so called Chemtrails and documented in thousands of videos and photos posted on thousands of websites on the World Wide Web. (2) Altnickel warns that spraying the stratosphere with chemicals and metals (polymers, fibers, cadmium, barium, aluminium, titanium, mercury, lead (3)) is not only a highly questionable technological attempt to contain and mitigate climate change effects, but also a means to manipulate the weather and to create inductive fields, of special interest for military purposes such as enhancement or interruption of communication technologies. The spraying has taken place ever since the beginning of the nineties, with intense and wide-range Chemtrail spraying over North America and most of the Western European countries. Altnickel suspects that the US's retreat from the Kyoto Treaty under George W. Bush is in the first place due to the assumption that it is 'cheaper' for governments to spray the skies and more profitable for the companies that provide the logistics, technology and substances being sprayed, than implementing and actually sticking to regulations that effectively protect the environment. The environmental contamination as a result of the massive injection of chemicals and metals into the atmosphere and the subsequent dangers to public health by exposure to hazardous elements stand in stark contrast to the proposed 'mitigation of climate change effects'. For Altnickel, the only peaceful way that can lead to popular resistance against these contaminating and highly dangerous practices is making people aware of what is happening, furthering public knowledge and understanding of these phenomena with the help of the new communications technologies.

It is worth to note that among the chief Science Advisors of the Climate Response Fund, host of the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies, are Edward A. Frieman, Research Professor, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University California, San Diego and Senior Vice President of Science and Technology at the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). (4) To our Venezuelan readers, Science Applications International Corporation is notoriously known and remembered as the Corporation which, by means of its subsidiary INTESA, owned and managed the technological and electronic components of Venezuelas State Oil Company, PDVSA, and which oversaw and conducted the electronic sabotage and shutdown of the industry's 'electronic brain' during the events of 2002-2003 that have come to be known as the management lockout and sabotage of Venezuela's industrial heart. According to a research undertaken by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele in March 2007, (5) SAIC is a private company, one of the main government contractors in the US, with a workforce of 44000 people and a true record of 9000 active individual government contracts with annual revenues between 8 and 12 billion dollars. The main product of the company is brainpower and expertise to guarantee 'national security':

„[...] SAIC is a body shop in the brain business. It sells human beings who have a particular expertise—expertise about weapons, about homeland security, about surveillance, about computer systems, about "information dominance" and "information warfare." If the C.I.A. needs an outside expert to quietly check whether its employees are using their computers for personal business, it calls on SAIC. If the Immigration and Naturalization Service needs new record-keeping software, it calls on SAIC. Indeed, SAIC is willing to provide expertise about almost anything at all, if there happens to be a government contract out there to pay for it—as there almost always is.“ (6)

Given the brief background sketched above with regard to the possible military applications of Solar Radiance Engineering, it is disturbing to think that the very Senior Vice President of Science and Technology at the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is among the chief Science Advisors of the Climate Response Fund, which is hosting the Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies this week in Pacific Grove, California. The conference's commitment to take into consideration the social context of climate intervention, the international legal framework for climate intervention (ENMOD) as well as 'ethical principles' with regard to climate intervention technologies, does little to tranquilize the mind. And this is why the closing event of the conference will be a 'plenary discussion on climate change, public attitudes, the media, and insights on implications for public discourse on climate intervention / geoengineering', read a brainstorming effort to resolve the problem of how to spin-doctor the world public into accepting and approving the application of these messing-with-the-climate-disaster techniques.

The upcoming World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth to be held in Cochabamba, Bolivia (7) from April 19th to 22nd, will definitely have to address the danger posed by this emerging 'Climate Change Management Lobby', which rather than fight the root causes of the problem seeks to mess with the disaster in multiple ways. The three basic postulates of the World People's Conference on Climate Change, that is, to determine and fight the structural causes of climate change, to live in harmony with nature and to recognize and establish the rights of Mother Earth, are fundamental pillars in what can be considered the only viable way to effectively respond to the threats to human survival. Recognizing that climate change is "a product of a model of life and development under the capitalist system that is premised on the supremacy of human beings over nature“, that it is necessary to "challenge the current system based on consumption, waste and the marketing of all aspects of life and nature", and thus demanding that the rights of Mother Earth be recognized and defended, is imperative to planetary survival. Messing around with the climate disaster and exploiting it for the sake of making profit from new climate intervention technologies and techniques, surely will pave the road to hell. The World People's Conference on Climate Change must stand up against climate intervention technologies, geoengineering and global environmental warfare.


Notes

(1) http://climateresponsefund.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=137&Itemid=81
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czde8N6zu0U
(3) http://www.chemtrails-info.de/chemtrails/chemikalien.htm
(4) http://climateresponsefund.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid=60
(5) http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/spyagency200703
(6) Ibidem
(7) http://pwccc.wordpress.com/

SOURCE: http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com/

Pubblished by Straker

Climate Engineers: il Trailer!

http://cospirazionista.blogspot.com/2009/09/climate-engineers-il-trailer.html

Climate Engineers: il Trailer!

Giusto per raccontarvi che anche a New York City qualcuno si chiede cosa stia succedendo riguardo alla presenza di scie persistenti, scie ad intermittenza, false scie di condensa, insomma riassumendo, riguardo all'utilizzo della geoingegneria, riprendo molto volentieri un post degli amici di New York sky watch.


Il DVD Climate Engineers è utile a tutti coloro che hanno assistito alle operazioni di aerosol clandestine, sanno cosa sta succedendo ma possono essere accerchiati da persone, amici, parenti che negano sistematicamente, trincerandosi dietro il loro recinto, cercando di ridicolizzare o polemizzare etc...

Ultimamente stiamo tutti sperando di portare avanti la questione, facendola uscire dal limbo della ridicolizzazione, dal regno dell'incertezza e di portarlo all'attenzione delle discussioni delle amministrazioni locali. (E noi con voi)



Approfitto di questo ultimo post per ribadire una volta per tutte dei concetti che mi stanno molto a cuore riguardo alla censura.

E' tristemente noto infatti, che i soliti disinformatori utilizzino "la moderazione dei commenti" di questo blog come pretesto per poter creare dei blog cloni e infarcire di commenti pieni di insulti i contenuti "presi da qui" e bellamente scopiazzati in questi troll-fake-blogs.

Questo non è un blog professionale, io non sono un giornalista, non sono un editore.
Non ho creato questo blog a scopo di lucro e non traggo nessun vantaggio economico nell'aggiornare questo blog. Ho deciso di creare questo spazio per fare la mia parte nella divulgazione di argomenti legati alla cospirazione globale quali le chemtrails, ma non solo.

Non mi ritengo dunque obbligato ad allestire uno spazio commenti, non mi ritengo obbligato ad accettare qualunque commento (così facendo farei un bel favore ai disinformatori che non hanno un cazzo da fare tutto il giorno e giocano con le parole e soprattutto con l'indicizzazione di esse sui motori di ricerca come Google), ma soprattutto mi sento in dovere di non accettare commenti da parte di persone non gradite a causa dei loro comportamenti e non di certo per qualsiasi sorta di pregiudiziale da parte mia.

Piuttosto questi signori dovrebbero scagliarsi contro la vera censura, quella che opera sui mainstream nazionali e sui giornali, da tanti, troppi anni.

I disinformatori in realtà sono un ammasso di ipocriti in quanto essi non solo non disprezzano la censura, ma ne sono essi stessi una conseguenza e la loro esistenza dipende da essa, dato che se non ci fosse la censura in TV e sui giornali non avrebbe senso creare fake blog da 100 utenti/giorno allo scopo di negare e smontare le notizie quando la televisione ed i giornali ne raggiungono almeno 10 milioni al giorno, di utenti.

Per non parlare poi della grottesca situazione descritta qui, dove la ciurma dei disinformatori, oltre ad insultare ed a "farsi i pompini a vicenda" (come direbbe Mr. Wolf), ha avuto il coraggio di basarsi su un sito che ammette le scie chimiche, per smentire una notizia dati da altri cospirazionisti, come me.

E' come se Piero Angela, per smentire il dottor Sheldrake, facesse riferimento ad una notizia (la sbufalata) comparsa sul sito di Wanna Marchi o sul blog di David Copperfield.

Pubblicato da System Failure