http://tankerenemy.blogspot.com/2011/09/book-about-military-strategies-explains.html
A book about military strategies explains why chemical aircrafts destroy the clouds
"The fundamentals of aircraft combat survibability: analysis and design"
of Robert A. Ball, is an important book about military strategies. Many
researchers and independent scientists studied the link between
humidity diminution and chemtrails. In fact, as soon as clouds appear in
the sky, chemical airplanes take off and fly to destroy them: rain,
snow and fog are an obstacle for electromagnetic signals through the
atmosphere. This activity is linked to R.F.M.P. and V.T.R.P.E. Military
purposes are described in the following excerpt: a technical source
confirm what some people had understood, by means of observation and
analyses.
3.6.2.5 Propagation of radar signals through the atmosphere.
Objective
3.6.14 Determine the attenuation of a radar signal as it propagates through the atmosphere.
Radar signals are attenuated by the oxygen and water vapour in the Earth’s atmosphere.
The attenuation becomes significant at frequencies above 10 GHz. The attenuation over a distance R can be expressed in the form exp(−Rα), where α is the rate of attenuation per unit distance. Converting the attenuation to a dB/km format, the approximate values of attenuation in terms of dB/km for a particular atmospheric condition are approximately −0.006 dB/km at 3 GHz, −0.01 dB/km at 10 GHz, and −0.07 dB/km at 30 GHz.42 The corresponding attenuation over a distance of 100 km is −0.6, −1.0, and −7 dB.
Precipitation in the atmosphere in the form of rain, snow and fog can significantly attenuate radar signals as well as contribute to background clutter. Generally, the higher the radar frequency, the more attenuation. The rate of attenuation for both a moderate rain and a heavy fog is approximately 0.1 dB/km for a 10 GHz radar signal. Consequently, the signal will be attenuated by 10 dB after traveling 100 km in a moderate rain or heavy fog.43.
Go to Problems 3.6.43 to 3.6.44. 3.6.2.6 Surveillance and weapon control radar descriptions.
Some of the attributes of effective air defense radars are all-weather capability, early and reliable detection (few false alarms) particularly for low-altitude targets, discrimination (the ability to detect and track a target in the presence of a high clutter environment), accurate target tracking, rapid automatic target acquisition, and countermeasures immunity. Table 3.13 lists estimated values for some of the major parameters of surveillance and weapon control radars, Example 3.8 contains the computations for several of the important radar parameters, and Refs. 44and 45 contain descriptions of some current radar systems.
Here the book
3.6.2.5 Propagation of radar signals through the atmosphere.
Objective
3.6.14 Determine the attenuation of a radar signal as it propagates through the atmosphere.
Radar signals are attenuated by the oxygen and water vapour in the Earth’s atmosphere.
The attenuation becomes significant at frequencies above 10 GHz. The attenuation over a distance R can be expressed in the form exp(−Rα), where α is the rate of attenuation per unit distance. Converting the attenuation to a dB/km format, the approximate values of attenuation in terms of dB/km for a particular atmospheric condition are approximately −0.006 dB/km at 3 GHz, −0.01 dB/km at 10 GHz, and −0.07 dB/km at 30 GHz.42 The corresponding attenuation over a distance of 100 km is −0.6, −1.0, and −7 dB.
Precipitation in the atmosphere in the form of rain, snow and fog can significantly attenuate radar signals as well as contribute to background clutter. Generally, the higher the radar frequency, the more attenuation. The rate of attenuation for both a moderate rain and a heavy fog is approximately 0.1 dB/km for a 10 GHz radar signal. Consequently, the signal will be attenuated by 10 dB after traveling 100 km in a moderate rain or heavy fog.43.
Go to Problems 3.6.43 to 3.6.44. 3.6.2.6 Surveillance and weapon control radar descriptions.
Some of the attributes of effective air defense radars are all-weather capability, early and reliable detection (few false alarms) particularly for low-altitude targets, discrimination (the ability to detect and track a target in the presence of a high clutter environment), accurate target tracking, rapid automatic target acquisition, and countermeasures immunity. Table 3.13 lists estimated values for some of the major parameters of surveillance and weapon control radars, Example 3.8 contains the computations for several of the important radar parameters, and Refs. 44and 45 contain descriptions of some current radar systems.
Here the book
Poi non sarebbe sbagliato, capire quello che si legge e si scrive.
ReplyDeleteGeniale...
ReplyDeleteHa scoperto che la pioggia e l'umidità assorbono le radioonde!!!!! Incredibile...
E' quello che sanno TUTTI GLI STUDENTI DI UN CORSO BASE DI TELECOMUNICAZIONI!! Tradotto per "certi ignoranti", questa cosa vuol dire che ci saranno grosso modo alcuni milioni di persone che conoscono questo "segreto"!!!
Vorrei capire, però, dove sta il "nesso logico" (l'ho virgolettato apposta) tra questa informazione e le scie chimiche: è inutile rigirare la frittata a cercare illogiche relazioni tra due eventi (uno reale ed uno immaginario!) per dimostrare che quello immaginario è reale... L'assorbimento delle onde radio è noto a tutti quelli che lavorano nelle telecomunicazioni e viene affrontato in maniera opportuna studiando e progettando il sistema di comunicazione (la stessa cosa la si fa coi radar!!!).
Quindi... Il libro non rivela NULLA sulle scie chimiche: descrive solamente quali sono i PROBLEMI che si incontrano a svolgere certe attività...
Niente di nuovo sotto la luce del Sole...
Ma si sa... chi è avulso dalla conoscenza di certi argomenti, invece di starsene zitto capita che apra la bocca a vanvera... ;-)
J.
Grazie Zret... nel mio prossimo post capirai cosa hai combinato!!!
ReplyDeleteAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Ecco qui il post
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/666vckm
GRAZIE ZRET!!!!!!!
Nico complimenti mi hai anticipato alla grande ! :-)
ReplyDeleteL'arte di arrampicarsi sugli specchi volendo sostenere l'insostenibile. Questo sarebbe il motto perfetto per i disinformatori che propagandano quell' amenità delle scie chimiche.
ReplyDeleteCome avevo già detto bisognerebbe capire quello che si legge e saperlo leggere, aggiungo che varrebbe la pena comprare e leggere questo bel libro che tratta delle strategie di sopravvivenza degli aerei da combattimento.
E invece trovo solo riportate con la solita superficialità i piccoli paragrafi estrapolati da un discorso globale più ampio che viene omesso volutamente in quanto screditante delle false credenze sulle scie chimiche.
riporto quello che si legge a pagina 785
with its ruggedness the P-38 had several shortcomings in combat. The turbosuperchargers produced a thick contrail at high altitudes that was visible to enemy fighters at great distances. The distinctive body design led to long-range recognition by the enemy fighter pilots and allowed them to prepare for engagement before the P-38 pilots spotted them
allego questa interessante testimonianza storica sul famoso raid di Bari
http://www.historynet.com/world-war-ii-german-raid-on-bari.htm
In merito al B-2 quindi si sta parlando dell' eccellenza della tecnica aeronautica e non di aerei civili si suppone l'uso di un acido per neutralizzare la formazione di ghiaccio delle scie di condensa, in realtà il sistema è risultato parzialmente inefficace e corrosivo senza contare la riduzione del carico bellico per tanto sul B-2 come altri aerei si è lavorato sulla pianificazione di volo a quote con meno rischio di formazione di scie di condensa e l'adozione di sensori che avvertono il pilota quando è opportuno cambiare quota
ecco i riferimenti
Everyone who has heard a B-2 take off has been astonished at the quietness. Obviously the noise would not be in the same class as the F101 engines of the B-1B in full afterburner, but writers have used the words 'shocking', 'uncanny' and 'incredible' in describing B-2 departures. As for elimination of contrails (condensation trails) (normally a giveaway even for a stealth aircraft), the USAF said chlorofluorosulphonic acid was injected into the jets to eliminate contrails. Later it said this was done by 'regulating exhaust temperatures'. Such an explanation is nonsense; contrails are ice crystals from water vapor left when hydrocarbon fuel is burned, and can never be eliminated by 'regulating exhaust temperatures'. Another point to note is that the channels downstream of the jetpipes appear to be carbon-fiber composite, which is incompatible with normal jet temperatures (not because of the fiber but because of the adhesive sticking them together).
Visibility:
The simplest stealth technology is simply camouflage; the use of paint or other materials to color and break up the lines of the vehicle or person.
Most stealth aircraft use matte paint and dark colors, and operate only at night. Lately, interest on daylight Stealth (especially by the USAF) has emphasized the use of gray paint in disruptive schemes, and it is assumed that Yehudi lights could be used in the future to mask shadows in the airframe (in daylight, against the clear background of the sky, dark tones are easier to detect than light ones) or as a sort of active camouflage. The original B-2 design had wing tanks for a contrail-inhibiting chemical, alleged by some to be chlorofluorosulphonic acid, but this was replaced in the final design with a contrail sensor from Ophir that alerts the pilot when he should change altitude and mission planning also considers altitudes where the probability of their formation is minimized.
E' comprensibile come questo cancelli tutte le bufale sulle scie chimiche raccontate sul web
Secondo round:
ReplyDeletehttp://nico-murdock.blogspot.com/2011/10/antonio-vs-rosario-2-arrampicarsi-sulle.html
:-)